Ontologies on the Semantic Web - Catherine Legg: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Appears in Collections: Arts and Social Sciences Papers | Appears in Collections: Arts and Social Sciences Papers | ||
==Ontologies on the Semantic Web== | ==Ontologies on the Semantic Web== | ||
Line 40: | Line 39: | ||
**Resource Description Framework | **Resource Description Framework | ||
===Introduction to Formal Ontology=== | ===Introduction to Formal Ontology=== | ||
*History of Ontology | |||
*Formal Ontology in Information Technology | |||
*The Logical Expressivity of Ontology Languages | |||
===Thesaurus Ontologies=== | ===Thesaurus Ontologies=== | ||
*Dublin Core Metadata Element Set | |||
*WordNet | |||
===Ontologies with Largely DL Expressivity=== | ===Ontologies with Largely DL Expressivity=== | ||
*Topics Maps | |||
*RDF Schema | |||
*DAML+OIL/OWL | |||
*SHOE | |||
===Ontologies with First-Order Logic Expressivity (or Higher)=== | ===Ontologies with First-Order Logic Expressivity (or Higher)=== | ||
*Cyc | |||
*SUMO | |||
*SUO | |||
===Domain Ontologies=== | ===Domain Ontologies=== | ||
===Ontology Libraries and Related Resources=== | ===Ontology Libraries and Related Resources=== | ||
===Conclusion=== | ===Conclusion=== | ||
*The Challenges Revisited | |||
*Possible Alternatives to the Semantic Web | |||
===Acknowledgments=== | ===Acknowledgments=== |
Revision as of 08:04, 7 March 2010
Reading group paper: 3/7/2010
Title: Ontologies on the semantic web
Author: Catherine Legg
Issue Date: 2007
Citation: Legg, C. (2007). Ontologies on the semantic web. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 407-451.
Additional Links: http://books.infotoday.com/asist/arist41.shtml
Abstract: As an informational technology, the World Wide Web has enjoyed spectacular success. In just ten years it has transformed the way information is produced, stored, and shared in arenas as diverse as shopping, family photo albums, and high-level academic research. The “Semantic Web” was touted by its developers as equally revolutionary but has not yet achieved anything like the Web’s exponential uptake. This 17 000 word survey article explores why this might be so, from a perspective that bridges both philosophy and IT.
Keywords: World Wide Web, Semantic Web, ontology, W3C, XML, RDF, OWL, interoperability, description logic, tags
Type: Journal Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10289/2872
Publisher's Statement: This is the published version of an article published in the journal: Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. © American Society for Information Science and Technology. Used with permission.
Appears in Collections: Arts and Social Sciences Papers
Ontologies on the Semantic Web
Introduction
- The World Wide Web
- Hypertext Markup Language
- Universal Resource Identifiers
- Hyperlinks
The Semantic Web
- Semantic Web Goals
- Challenges
- Semantic Web Technologies
- Extensible Markup Language
- XML Schemas
- Resource Description Framework
Introduction to Formal Ontology
- History of Ontology
- Formal Ontology in Information Technology
- The Logical Expressivity of Ontology Languages
Thesaurus Ontologies
- Dublin Core Metadata Element Set
- WordNet
Ontologies with Largely DL Expressivity
- Topics Maps
- RDF Schema
- DAML+OIL/OWL
- SHOE
Ontologies with First-Order Logic Expressivity (or Higher)
- Cyc
- SUMO
- SUO
Domain Ontologies
Ontology Libraries and Related Resources
Conclusion
- The Challenges Revisited
- Possible Alternatives to the Semantic Web