Ontologies on the Semantic Web - Catherine Legg: Difference between revisions

From lotico
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
Appears in Collections: Arts and Social Sciences Papers
Appears in Collections: Arts and Social Sciences Papers


TOC


==Ontologies on the Semantic Web==
==Ontologies on the Semantic Web==
Line 40: Line 39:
**Resource Description Framework
**Resource Description Framework
===Introduction to Formal Ontology===
===Introduction to Formal Ontology===
====History of Ontology====
*History of Ontology
====Formal Ontology in Information Technology====
*Formal Ontology in Information Technology
====The Logical Expressivity of Ontology Languages====
*The Logical Expressivity of Ontology Languages
===Thesaurus Ontologies===
===Thesaurus Ontologies===
====Dublin Core Metadata Element Set====
*Dublin Core Metadata Element Set
====WordNet====
*WordNet
===Ontologies with Largely DL Expressivity===
===Ontologies with Largely DL Expressivity===
====Topics Maps====
*Topics Maps
====RDF Schema====
*RDF Schema
====DAML+OIL/OWL====
*DAML+OIL/OWL
====SHOE====
*SHOE
===Ontologies with First-Order Logic Expressivity (or Higher)===
===Ontologies with First-Order Logic Expressivity (or Higher)===
====Cyc====
*Cyc
====SUMO====
*SUMO
====SUO====
*SUO
===Domain Ontologies===
===Domain Ontologies===
===Ontology Libraries and Related Resources===
===Ontology Libraries and Related Resources===
===Conclusion===
===Conclusion===
====The Challenges Revisited====
*The Challenges Revisited
====Possible Alternatives to the Semantic Web====
*Possible Alternatives to the Semantic Web
===Acknowledgments===
===Acknowledgments===

Revision as of 08:04, 7 March 2010

Reading group paper: 3/7/2010

Title: Ontologies on the semantic web

Author: Catherine Legg

Issue Date: 2007

Citation: Legg, C. (2007). Ontologies on the semantic web. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 407-451.

Additional Links: http://books.infotoday.com/asist/arist41.shtml

Abstract: As an informational technology, the World Wide Web has enjoyed spectacular success. In just ten years it has transformed the way information is produced, stored, and shared in arenas as diverse as shopping, family photo albums, and high-level academic research. The “Semantic Web” was touted by its developers as equally revolutionary but has not yet achieved anything like the Web’s exponential uptake. This 17 000 word survey article explores why this might be so, from a perspective that bridges both philosophy and IT.

Keywords: World Wide Web, Semantic Web, ontology, W3C, XML, RDF, OWL, interoperability, description logic, tags

Type: Journal Article

URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10289/2872

Publisher's Statement: This is the published version of an article published in the journal: Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. © American Society for Information Science and Technology. Used with permission.

Appears in Collections: Arts and Social Sciences Papers


Ontologies on the Semantic Web

Introduction

  • The World Wide Web
  • Hypertext Markup Language
  • Universal Resource Identifiers
  • Hyperlinks

The Semantic Web

  • Semantic Web Goals
  • Challenges
  • Semantic Web Technologies
    • Extensible Markup Language
    • XML Schemas
    • Resource Description Framework

Introduction to Formal Ontology

  • History of Ontology
  • Formal Ontology in Information Technology
  • The Logical Expressivity of Ontology Languages

Thesaurus Ontologies

  • Dublin Core Metadata Element Set
  • WordNet

Ontologies with Largely DL Expressivity

  • Topics Maps
  • RDF Schema
  • DAML+OIL/OWL
  • SHOE

Ontologies with First-Order Logic Expressivity (or Higher)

  • Cyc
  • SUMO
  • SUO

Domain Ontologies

Ontology Libraries and Related Resources

Conclusion

  • The Challenges Revisited
  • Possible Alternatives to the Semantic Web

Acknowledgments